Sunday, 30 October 2016

TED talk reflection

 what are Shermer's primary claims?
  • We have a tendency to see faces
  • Humans are pattern seeking
  • Auditory allusions - people hear what they want to hear

which real-life situations/examples did you find most powerful in terms of illustrating these claims?
  • The face on mars.
Image result for up close face on mars
In 1976 there was a large movement for NASA to photograph an area of the moon as people thought it was a piece of architecture made by extra-terrestrial life forms, when actually it was just a mound with protruding parts making it appear as a face

  • The Virgin Mary in Clearwater Florida.
Image result for virgin mary clearwater florida
The silhouette of the Virgin Mary appeared to be on the side of the building. Many people of the religious community came to see this holy sight . Thousands of candles were laid out in front of the building and lit in tribute of the Virgin Mary. After an investigation of the building, Shermer, Dawkins and Randi concluded that wherever there was a palm tree and sprinkler, the image would appear

  • Film white noise with Michael Keaton about the dead talking back. Supposedly there is a hidden demonic message in the song 'stairway to heaven'. Shermer plays a snippet of the song. The songs reads:
Machine generated alternative text:
If there's a bustle in your hedgerow. 
Don't be alarmed now. 
It's just a spring clean 
for the May Queen. 
Yes, there are two paths you 
can go by, but in the long run. 
There's still time to change 
the road you're on.
Keaton then plays the snippet backwards without displaying the words of the reversed version, the only clear word that can be hear is 'Satan'. He then plays it again, displaying the 'supposed' massage:
Machine generated alternative text:
Oh 
Here's to my sweet Satan. 
The one whose little path 
would make me sad whose 
power is Satan. 
He'll give you, give you 666. 
There was a little toolshed where 
he made us suffer, sad Satan.
Now that the audience can see the words that they are supposed to hear, the words can be heard clearly. 


which areas of knowledge were the real-life situations/examples primarily drawn from?
  • Our search for meaning in terms of not being the only intelligent life form in the galaxy and that intelligent life would 'resemble us'
  • Religious knowledge: In the Christian faith the Virgin Mary  is and always has been a symbol of hope.
  • The belief that evil exists and the belief that everything has a deeper meaning.

do you agree or disagree with Shermer's primary claims and why?
Yes I definitely agree with Shermer's claims
According to research, one reason could just be that we see so many faces in our day-to-day lives, we’re expecting to see them everywhere. 
“Starting from childhood, they are the most common stimuli that we encounter in everyday life,” There could also be deeper, evolutionary reasons for why we are especially prone to see faces. Human survival depends so heavily on others – whether we need their help,

Other research suggests that the brain, being hard-wired to understand people and their motivations, tries to look for human-like intention in everything around us. In a bid to make sense of our fears, we begin to personify them, filling the world with gods and demons.

Interesting study that contributes to this:
A study was done on the appearance of cars, these two images were shown
Machine generated alternative text:
(Dodge/Chrysler) (Credit: Dodge/Chrysler)
Two groups of people were asked; Europeans and Ethiopians. The Ethiopian group had never seen any Disney movies about cars yet both groups' results were the same. The top car looks like a happy face and that cars with big windscreen, round headlights and a small grill tend to be considered young and feminine while the second car appeared to be angry and that cars with flatter headlights and a bigger, squarer under-body are older and more masculine.

From the moment of birth, the brain is trained to search for and recognise patterns. We are always looking for patterns and then connect a meaning to it. For example: putting a bird in a box with two buttons, after pecking each one it receives a treat. It does that again and gets another. The bird now associates that sequence with getting food so it will continue this pattern.  Humans are the same, in fact, it is highly unlikely that baby will reply/react without a goofy grin from a human. The brain has no restrictions on this pattern seeking, it sees patterns where there is almost no information to present one, and it sees patterns when there are not any, palm reading, for instance. In his book “ How we Believe” Michael Shermer argues that human brains are belief engines- kind of pattern recognition machines that connect the dots and create meaning out of the patterns that they see, observe and come across in nature.

The brain can be fooled by the ears just as it can be fooled by the eyes. The main difference is, we're quicker to realise that our eyes are fooling us. Humans hear what they want to hear or what they think they are hearing. An experiment was done to prove this: a man was filmed saying the word 'bar, bar, bar'. He then says 'far, far, far' In fact the audio didn’t change between the two takes. In the second he was silently saying 'far, far, far' but the word 'bar' was being played. Because he make the 'f'  sound with his lips we heard 'far'. The clip then plays the two next to each other. Depending on the one you look at is the thing your hear. It shows that we hear what we think we are hearing and seeing. 

 <http://io9.gizmodo.com/the-science-of-audio-illusions-or-fooling-peoples-ear-1530377318>
<https://www.quora.com/What-does-this-quote-mean-Humans-are-pattern-seeking-animals-and-we-are-adept-at-finding-patterns-whether-they-exist-or-not%E2%80%9D>
 <http://matus1976.com/science/pattern_seeking/page1.htm>